Theory of Human Motivation

by Abraham Maslow (1943)

Introduction 

In a previous paper (A preface to motivation theory. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1943, 5, 85-92) various propositions were presented which would have to be included in any theory of human motivation that could lay claim to being definitive. These conclusions may be briefly summarized as follows:

1. The integrated wholeness of the organism must be one of the foundation stones of motivation theory.
2. The hunger drive (or any other physiological drive) was rejected as a centering point or model for a definitive theory of motivation. Any drive that is somatically based and localizable was shown to be atypical rather than typical in human motivation.
3. Such a theory should stress and center itself upon ultimate or basic goals rather than partial or superficial ones, upon ends rather than means to these ends. Such a stress would imply a more central place for unconscious than for conscious motivations.
4. There are usually available various cultural paths to the same goal. Therefore conscious, specific, local-cultural desires are not as fundamental in motivation theory as the more basic, unconscious goals.
5. Any motivated behavior, either preparatory or consummatory, must be understood to be a channel through which many basic needs may be simultaneously expressed or satisfied. Typically an act has more than one motivation.
6. Practically all organismic states are to be understood as motivated and as motivating.
7. Human needs arrange themselves in hierarchies of pre-potency. That is to say, the appearance of one need usually rests on the prior satisfaction of another, more pre-potent need. Man is a perpetually wanting animal. Also no need or drive can be treated as if it were isolated or discrete; every drive is related to the state of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of other drives.
8. Lists of drives will get us nowhere for various theoretical and practical reasons. Furthermore any classification of motivations must deal with the problem of levels of specificity or generalization the motives to be classified.
9. Classifications of motivations must be based upon goals rather than upon instigating drives or motivated behavior.
10. Motivation theory should be human-centered rather than animal-centered.
11. The situation or the field in which the organism reacts must be taken into account but the field alone can rarely serve as an exclusive explanation for behavior. Furthermore the field itself must be interpreted in terms of the organism. Field theory cannot be a substitute for motivation theory.
12. Not only the integration of the organism must be taken into account, but also the possibility of isolated, specific, partial or segmental reactions. It has since become necessary to add to these another affirmation.
13. Motivation theory is not synonymous with behavior theory. The motivations are only one class of determinants of behavior. While behavior is almost always motivated, it is also almost always biologically, culturally and situationally determined as well.

Related News

Sheldon Drobny: God Damn America's Media: Rev. Wright's Comment On Hiroshima (HuffingtonPost)
Rev. Wright's comment about his belief that Hiroshima was part of America's disregard for human life led to his comment: "The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God...

Your Daily Horoscope (UPI)
UPI horoscopes for March 16, 2008

? (Canada.com)
It's Friday afternoon and the surf is up on Maui's Lahaina Beach. As we -- the motley crew that is my family -- slip into our water boots and wetsuit tops, I can't help but wonder whether our surf instructor can live up to the Nancy Emerson School of Surfing guarantee to "transform and accelerate our surfing to new heights of confidence and precision." Although our instructor has been surfing ...

Rethinking Personal Digital Archiving, Part 1 (D-Lib Magazine)
Underlying the technical discussions of digital archiving are two unifying assumptions: (1) preservation will rely on the ability to represent individual digital objects – academic papers, datasets, multimedia creative works, and so on – in such a way that they may be decoded and accurately rendered many years hence (see, for example, [ Lesk , 1995; Heminger and Robertson , 1998; Lorie , 2002; ...

Ghana: Media Effects (AllAfrica.com)
In his book, My Trade :A Short History of British Journalism', Andrew Marr, BBC's Political correspondent explains how he laboured to finger out what was good or bad news and what to publish or not to publish.